A Room Is Still a Room, Even When There’s No One There, Butt Gloom?
[Washington’s Headquarters, FOB Morristown, June 4, 2025] Any station? Any station? Do you read? Over.
Live from the world’s newest banana republic. . .
According to one helluva entertainer, a chair is not a house, and a house is not a home, when the two of us are far apart, and one of us has a broken heart”, and lately, in the all consuming politics, call Elisabeth Shue, because nobody leaves here without singing the blues. And, everyone from folks upset about the exploited workers at their favorite restaurant in San Diego being deported away from their opportunities far better off in subjugation here than in Latin America, to veterans on social media claiming they don’t know what country they fought for anymore sounds like they are ready to write a new country song, but one litigation hobbyist who, by any definition, could be described as vexatious, even if one former President had used the term “passion”, for the recipient of a letter from the Congregation of the Causes of Saints at the Vatican, “regarding the grace that Almighty God has bestowed”, is once again a pesky independent, just waiting to get drubbed by battle-hardened Arlington Democrats in a free and fair election, as a not a serious option, make-a-statement candidate, pandering to a small, right leaning base. So, if you don’t have to worry about winning an election, why not join the throngs of litigants who courts warn may open the floodgates, a proposition expressly rejected as plausible even in the Declaration of Independence, which had noted “what all experience hath shewn”?
“Well, Howard, as you know, I am internationally notorious for research, and apparently having brought around 50 cases in federal courts in the past few years, I am returning to the place where I made a name for myself in the porn industry. I had the opportunity to review a Jacobson v. Massachusetts case revisited when the Biden Administration set off a wave of prosecutions under the FACE Act, in which the judge shall we say kindly reminded defense counsel that they had misplaced reliance in their attempt to quash an indictment with a defense of selective prosecution, which is examined under a two-part test, beginning with whether your client had actually committed the crime. To use a contemporary example on social media. Say I am a citizen, a regular Bruce Springsteen, born in the USA. And suddenly ICE agents round me up and deport me to El Salvador. If the glove don’t fit, right? We should all remember that law lesson, even though it has been a while. But then next, by clear and convincing evidence, if you are dead to rights caught red-handed, the operative question is whether or not you have been singled out. Do people block abortion mills? The papers say yes. Do people stop people from going to church? Well, yes, but who complains? We have even had a civil remedy since 1994, a hastily added last-minute amendment offered by Mormon Orin Hatch to Chappaquiddick Ted Kennedy’s law to protect abortion. Talk about the last person I would make the frontman. And a Catholic, for the love of God! However, generally, in our cases, we find folks in court when we have some controversy. You won’t let me get married in your church, or bake my wedding cake, or let me kill my baby, or whatever. Why we don’t find country songs about our lost rights, who knows. And so, consequently, our jurisprudence is shaped by those outcasts who feel aggrieved, like the Maryland atheist notary, the suddenly converted to Islam boxer who told us about jihad that had not been declared in Southeast Asia, or the dude with tarot cards who happened to be in Attica prison. How about the Jewish dad who sued the principal, Robert E. Lee, because he had invited a rabbi to the high school graduation to say a prayer so his kid wouldn’t feel left out. Talk about the road to Hell being paved with good intentions, right? Well, I have only now found three, besides mine, Hatch Amendment cases brought under the FACEA, faco, facere, feci, factum, as they say, one by some LGTQ folks and now this one upon which attorneys in U.S. v. Williams had relied upon. We had one more fella who filled out an application and said he was just a prayer group and not a church, and, like in Wilner v. CIA, where the government cannot reverse itself and claim a document doesn’t exist, unless it demonstrates we had a hand in beating Hitler in the Holocaust, under our new rule, you can’t be the guy in 12 Monkeys who wanted to video record shows that already aired. Practice makes perfect and one side—no names—tends to grab attorneys who bring no evidence or experts with ludicrous claims, like derogated Preamble rights, while the other cherry picks plaintiffs to exploit, like the Native American little girl on her second pregnancy who we called a Negro, but who was totally legit under the Pochohantas Exception—so much for that Loving myth some want to believe and claim they don’t engage in religious fanaticism. Legal fictions predate alleging a trespass at Middlesex, but it’s good television, and who reads? Hell Who cares?” remarked Major Mike Webb.
Your elected representative is called your elected representative for a reason; and Martin Luther King and Jesus never got elected.
And let’s get ready to RUMBLE! https://rumble.com/vp2uk1-attorneys-need-not-apply-you-have-the-right-to-remain-silent.html.
Share this post